Judicial Caning in Singapore - a Human
Rights offence against Minors.
How is the Inhuman Act of State
Inflicted Judicial Caning carried out in Singaporean Schools?
The Inhumane and Violent Act Judicial Caning of Children in
Singapore Corporal punishment can only be inflicted by the principal or
under his express authority. Time has proven, and is tested and ttried
by developed countries, that it is not necessary to inflict wounds or
physical attacks on children to discipline them, and that teachers who
do so in civilised countries are charged with criminal assault on a
minor.
Main Menu | Corrupt Justice in
Singapore | Criminalisation
of Citizens with Political Views | Help Singaporeans Tell their Story
Inhumane Judicial Caning of
Minors in Singapore
Only male pupils can be
caned because the Justice system is run by the Mafia-Like Women's
Society
and Women's Charter, which is why men are always at a
disadvantage
in Singaporean Justice. A range of 1 to 3 strokes of a light
cane may be given on the palms or buttocks over clothing.
Caning is usually done as a last resort, and for serious offences. In a
2016 example, about 30 students from an all-boys school were caned —
several publicly, in front of their respective levels.
Guidelines and school rules for corporal punishment Generally,
MOE
identifies a list of minor and major offences, and gives guidelines on
the methods to dealing with these offences, including repeated
offences.Firmness and fairness is emphasised in these guidelines,
taking into consideration the best approach for the students’
well-being and learning. The guidelines given to schools applies to
full-time primary and full-time secondary schools, including junior
colleges and centralised institutes providing pre-university education.
However, while there are guidelines, schools are free to determine
their own rules based on their “context and needs” within the given
framework.
These rules are communicated to students and parents during enrolment,
via the student handbook, on the school’s website, in parent-teacher
meetings and letters to parents.Therefore, it is up to the senior
management of the school to decide whether to adopt corporal punishment
or (public) caning in their school.
If a State Official can beat the crap out of your child, without the
parent having any right to complain or prosecute, but the parent and
caregiver themself, is subject to prosecution for doing the same, then
this must be questioned as to whether
the Singaporean State is giving
itself more rights over children than the actual parents?,
And that
Singaporean parents can only stand by
helplessly and do nothing as the teacher
beats the crap out of the child with a Judicial Caning!
Such Inhumane
Behaviour is unacceptable, and it is a total surprise that Singapore is
allowed Membership in the United Nations with such State Inflicted
Child Abuse on 14 year olds and above!
Judicial Caning in Singapore is a
Serious
Human Rights Offence Against Minors, for which teachers in the UK and
Europe would be charged with for criminal assault on a Minor!
Singapore's
controversial caning of American teenager Michael Fay for vandalism in
1994, spurred at least two books were published in America, the first
being "The Caning of Michael Fay," and the other being "The Flogging of
Singapore - The Michael Fay Affair"
In President Clinton's Government,the official statement was that;
"We see a large discrepancy
between the offence and the punishment. The cars [spray-painted by Fay
and his chums] were not permanently damaged; the paint was removed with
thinner. Caning leaves permanent scars."
But in Singapore the Government is so backward and Despotic,
that it still believes in the Victorian Values it had when the Colonialist
British were in Possession of the Country, but have not developed like
Britain in their legislation, rather, have created the most Decrepid
and Inhumane Justice System in South-East Asia. It is Ironic that the
Judicial Punishments in Singapore are ten times harder than countries
like Thailand, but that People have the impression that countries like
Thailand have less Human Rights than Singapore, which is a total
fallacy. Singapore may be more technologically and economically
developed, but it stands in the shadow of Thailand Justice, and that of
Malaysian Justice (which is als in question as far as Human Rights are
concerned, as is every country to some extent or
other)
Main Menu | Corrupt Justice in
Singapore | Criminalisation
of Citizens with Political Views | Help Singaporeans Tell their Story
Inhumane Judicial Caning of
Minors in Singapore
